During testing, several people pointed out that once a board starts to fill up, the real challenge is no longer collecting feedback but making sense of it. While individual tickets are useful on their own, the value drops when teams have to manually scan, group, and interpret dozens of similar or overlapping inputs.

They suggested it would be incredibly valuable if Round Two could synthesise all tickets on a board into a set of clear, high-level action items. Not a summary for the sake of summarising, but concrete directions a team can actually act on. For example, surfacing recurring themes, identifying the underlying problems behind multiple tickets, and translating that into suggested next steps or priorities.